Author Archives: %s

Release Notes: March 13th – NE & Reports

12 Mar 23
Craig Smith
No Comments

A product deployment for TaxSlayer Pro Online will occur Monday, March 13th, beginning at 5:00am ET to release the below update(s). Note that deployments may take up to 3 hours to complete. During this time, access to the program may be limited.

NEBRASKA

  • Amended questions marked YES are showing NO on the PDF (Issue 9834)

REPORTS

  • Return Transmitted report not displaying Last 4 of SSN (Issue 8744)

Release Notes: March 10th – CT, ID, NY & Reports

09 Mar 23
Craig Smith
No Comments

A product deployment for TaxSlayer Pro Online will occur Friday, March 10th, beginning at 5:00am ET to release the below update(s). Note that deployments may take up to 3 hours to complete. During this time, access to the program may be limited.

CONNECTICUT

  • MFS for spouse not pulling in wages and dividend income (Issue 9762)

IDAHO

  • Form 39R, Section D, Line 2 and 3 not calculating (Issue 9679)

NEW YORK

  • NY homeowner tax rebate amount not carrying to Yonkers Worksheet, Line i (Issue 9633)

REPORTS

  • SPDR – Electronic report not displaying EIC, CTC, and ACTC amounts (Issue 9587)

Message from MO DOR: HoH and Qualifying Widow(er)

08 Mar 23
Craig Smith
No Comments

Software vendors received the below message from MO DOR this morning.

Good Morning,

Missouri DOR recently issued letters to Missouri taxpayers who filed with a Head of Household or Qualifying Widow(er) filing status from 2018 -2021, regarding a credit for 2022 Individual Income Tax. DOR’s Income Tax Bureau has provided me the information below to send out, so the software developer community is aware of this and able to address customer inquiries regarding the letters. As noted below, the credit will automatically be applied by DOR and does not need to be claimed on the 2022 MO return.

On Dec. 22, 2017, the federal government passed the Tax Cut and Jobs Act. This act made significant changes to the federal tax code, including the removal of personal exemptions and dependent deductions. As the state of Missouri bases the income tax calculation on an individual’s federal income tax return, the Missouri Department of Revenue made similar changes beginning with the 2018 tax year, by removing a number of exemptions and deductions from the calculation of the Missouri income tax. 

The Department has performed a subsequent review of Section 143.161.2 RSMo, with reference to the removal of the $1,400 personal exemption provided to individuals using the filing status of Head of Household or Qualifying Widow(er). The Department has determined to reestablish the personal exemption on the 2022 individual income tax return and to retroactively apply the exemption to tax years 2018 through 2021 to eligible filers.

If the application of the additional exemption for eligible filers resulted in an overpayment for years 2018 through 2021, the Department applied those amounts as a credit on the 2022 income tax period. When taxpayers file their 2022 income tax return, the credit(s) will automatically be applied to the income tax return.”

Release Notes: March 8th – CO, F1042-S, F2106 & ME

07 Mar 23
Craig Smith
No Comments

A product deployment for TaxSlayer Pro Online will occur Wednesday, March 8th, beginning at 5:00am ET to release the below update(s). Note that deployments may take up to 3 hours to complete. During this time, access to the program may be limited.

COLORADO

  • DR-0102 deceased person’s last name is carrying to other TP’s last name on PDF (Issue 9437)

FORM 1042-S

  • Update PDF to reflect 2022 (Issue 9508)

FORM 2106

  • Adding “Total Miles” input within F2016 menu (Issue 7723)

MAINE

  • Standard Deduction when a dependent not including scholarship income (Issue 9509)

Release Notes: March 6th – F1099-Q, IL, NY, NC & WV

05 Mar 23
Craig Smith
No Comments

A product deployment for TaxSlayer Pro Online will occur Monday, March 6th, beginning at 5:00am ET to release the below update(s). Note that deployments may take up to 3 hours to complete. During this time, access to the program may be limited.

FORM 1099-Q

  • Saving 1099-Q entry throws an error (Issue 9227)

ILLINOIS

  • Selecting YES to pull Federal amended return explanation to IL is not saving (Issue 9385)

NEW YORK

  • Reject Code R0102 (Issue 9405)

NORTH CAROLINA

  • Issue printing a NC return when estimated payment vouchers are present (Issue 8999)

WEST VIRGINIA

  • Adding WV return is breaking the print (Issue 9447)

Release Notes: March 3rd – 1040-NR, W-2, ME & MN

02 Mar 23
Craig Smith
No Comments

A product deployment for TaxSlayer Pro Online will occur Friday, March 3rd, beginning at 5:00am ET to release the below update(s). Note that deployments may take up to 3 hours to complete. During this time, access to the program may be limited.

FORM 1040-NR

  • Remove adjustment from income entry for scholarship/grant income (Issue 9305)

FORM W-2

  • Box 4 is not including amounts also in Box 7 when Box 4 is greater than Box 3 (Issue 9159)

MAINE

  • Line 3 of the Schedule 1S, Line 4 worksheet is not including RRB Tier 2 amount (Issue 9342)

MINNESOTA

  • Undoing the update from Issue 8979 related to Line 18 Worksheet of the M1PR due to MN DOR input (Issue 8979)

TaxSlayer Pro Online: Printing Issue Related to NC Estimated Payment Vouchers [RESOLVED]

02 Mar 23
Craig Smith
No Comments

3/24/2023: This has been resolved.


3/6/2023: We are still receiving reports of sporadic printing issues for NC with estimated payment vouchers added. We have opened a new high priority work item (Issue 9563)


3/6/2023: The fix is live.


The fix is scheduled to be deployed the morning of Monday, March 6th.


Our development team is aware returns with a NC return added (more specifically with Form NC-40, Estimated Payment Vouchers) are continuing to experience printing issues. We will update this post as additional information is available. If you have returns impacted at your site, we have a couple recommendations that may help depending on what you are trying to do.

Note: E-filing NC returns with estimated payment vouchers is not impacted.

If you are trying to quality review an impacted return, remove the estimated payment vouchers. The same is true to provide a copy of the return to the taxpayer. Obviously the taxpayer needs the payment vouchers, otherwise they wouldn’t be added to the NC return. Once our issue is resolved, we recommend utilizing the Customer Portal to provide a copy of the return to the TP with the vouchers. Another option is to try to print the return from other areas of the application such as:

  • Summary/Print page
  • State PDF View from the State Section grid
  • Submission page of e-file
  • Client List
  • Client Status

Release Notes: March 1st – AR, KY, MN, NM & Sch. C

28 Feb 23
Craig Smith
No Comments

A product deployment for TaxSlayer Pro Online will occur Wednesday, March 1st, beginning at 5:00am ET to release the below update(s). Note that deployments may take up to 3 hours to complete. During this time, access to the program may be limited.

ARKANSAS

  • Credit for Taxes Paid to Another State step 2 calculation concern (Issue 9195)

KENTUCKY

  • MFS return not displaying SP name on PDF (Issue 9229)

MINNESOTA

  • Add question for TP/SP regarding Frontline Worker Payment subtraction (2022 Update)
  • Line 18 worksheet for M1PR not generating in all applicable instances (Issue 8979)

NEW MEXICO

  • PIT-1, Line 10 adding back “general sales tax” in from Federal, Schedule A error (Issue 9268)

SCHEDULE C

  • Change “Not Applicable” to “Other” in Operations About Your Business menu (Issue 8573)