Author Archives: %s

Reporting Minnesota Frontline Worker Pay

28 Feb 23
Craig Smith
No Comments

How does it work in TaxSlayer? Inside the Subtractions from Income menu at the bottom, preparers will answer the below question YES or NO. Based on the selection, the program will automatically calculate the appropriate subtraction for the return. If any adjustments are needed, MN has indicated those adjustments will occur on their end after the return has been e-filed and accepted. Prior behavior for this subtraction allowed the preparer to manually enter the appropriate subtraction value in the return. This manual entry resulted in erroneous MN Reject Code 0628:Severity: ErrorM1M line 29 must not be more than 488 for single, HOH or MFS, and no more than 976 for MFJ. Xpath: M1M Line 29: ReturnState/ReturnDataState/SchM1M/FrontLineWorkerPayAmt“.

Due to the reject code being issued, the entry behavior was updated to be an automatic calculation instead.

 


Frontline Worker Pay was signed into law on April 29, 2022. Over 1 million Minnesota workers qualified for the $487.45 payment. Federal Forms 1099 were not issued for these payments. The Minnesota Department of Revenue discovered that taxpayers reported this payment incorrectly on 97% of current tax returns filed. As a reminder, this payment is federally taxable and must be reported on line 8 of a taxpayer’s federal Schedule 1 (Form 1040).

The payment is not taxable for Minnesota returns. If the payment is:

  • Reported on line 8 of Schedule 1, also enter this amount on these lines:
    • Line 29 of Schedule M1M, Income Additions and Subtractions
    • Line 10 of Form M1PR, Homestead Credit Refund (for Homeowners) and Renter’s Property Tax Refund
    • Line 5b of Schedule M1ED, K-12 Education Credit
  • Not reported on line 8 of Schedule 1, do not include the payment on the lines above.

Entering Frontline Worker Pay properly on both the federal and Minnesota returns will ensure Minnesota adjusted gross income is calculated correctly.

Release Notes: February 27th – KS, KY & WI

26 Feb 23
Craig Smith
No Comments

A product deployment for TaxSlayer Pro Online will occur Monday, February 27th, beginning at 5:00am ET to release the below update(s). Note that deployments may take up to 3 hours to complete. During this time, access to the program may be limited.

KANSAS

  • Amended return not being marked as amended on PDF (Issue 8971)

KENTUCKY

  • 1099-MISC, Box 3 income is doubling on the KY return (Issue 8975)

WISCONSIN

  • Selecting “Yes” to generate the Schedule FC-A is not saving (Issue 8911)

Release Notes: February 24th – CA, E-file, MI & Sch. A

23 Feb 23
Craig Smith
No Comments

A product deployment for TaxSlayer Pro Online will occur Friday, February 24th, beginning at 5:00am ET to release the below update(s). Note that deployments may take up to 3 hours to complete. During this time, access to the program may be limited.

CALIFORNIA (2021)

  • Ineligible MFS return receiving EITC (Issue 8741)

E-FILE

  • Federal returns stuck in transmitted status when NJ and VA returns also present (Issue 8935)

MICHIGAN

  • D.O.B. 1/1/1956 displaying as 66 instead of 67 on Line 23B of Schedule 1 (Issue 8865)

SCHEDULE A

  • Update sales tax rates for Clark County (NV) zip codes (Issue 8836)

Release Notes: February 23rd – MS & WV

23 Feb 23
Craig Smith
No Comments

A product deployment for TaxSlayer Pro Online will occur Thursday, February 23rd, beginning at 5:00am ET to release the below update(s). Note that deployments may take up to 3 hours to complete. During this time, access to the program may be limited.

MISSISSIPPI

  • E-file block related to installment agreement request (Issue 8894)

WEST VIRGINIA

  • Entries related to income of individuals living in the same household were not savings for the homestead excess property tax credit (Issue 8842)

Message from New Mexico: Error Code 366

22 Feb 23
Craig Smith
No Comments

Software vendors received the below message from New Mexico. Impacted returns can be resubmitted today.


We are aware that a number of vendors have noted receiving rejections, for PIT TY22 filings, with error code 366: “Schedule PIT-ADJ, line 23. Amount cannot exceed $10,000.” We understand that this has prevented the submission of returns, filed as Married Filing Jointly, where both primary and spouse are claiming the armed forces exemption and where the amount on PIT-ADJ line 23 is $20,000. After review, we have revised this business rule to allow returns filed as Married Filing Jointly to claim $20,000 on PIT-ADJ line 23. All other filings will continue to have the $10,000 limit for this exemption. This correction will be available in our production environment as of the morning of 2/22/23, and you may resubmit any returns incorrectly rejected with error code 366 after that time.

We apologize for any confusion resulting from this issue, and we appreciate the outreach by those of you who first noted the problem.

Release Notes: February 22nd – CA, CT, E-file, F8915-F, IL, LA, MD, MI, Print Sets & Reports

21 Feb 23
Craig Smith
No Comments

A product deployment for TaxSlayer Pro Online will occur Wednesday, February 22nd, beginning at 5:00am ET to release the below update(s). Note that deployments may take up to 3 hours to complete. During this time, access to the program may be limited.

CALIFORNIA

  • EITC calculating on an ineligible MFS return (Issue 8584)

CONNECTICUT

  • Estimated payment vouchers showing 2022 on PDF instead of 2023 (Issue 8742)

E-FILE

  • Do not show fee related validations on Submission Page (Issue 8831)

FORM 8915-F

  • Returns getting an error when pulling forward 8915-F from 2021 (Issue 8818)

ILLINOIS

  • IL-8453, Line 10 not displaying direct debit date (Issue 8578)
  • IL-1040, Line 5 not calculating (Issue 8607)

LOUISIANA

  • School Readiness Credit not displaying on Schedule J, Line 4 (Issue 8683)

MARYLAND

  • Spouse entry for Form 502SU, Line v not carrying to PDF (Issue 8839)

MICHIGAN

  • Update calculation of pension subtraction for deceased spouse (Issue 7592)

PRINT SETS

  • Add ability at site level to watermark assigned print sets (2022 Update)

REPORTS

  • Old Fed/State ack reports for prior years rendering an error (Issue 8770)

Message from GA DOR: Delay in Acknowledgements

21 Feb 23
Craig Smith
No Comments

Software vendors received the below messaging from GA DOR.

“FYI – We are experiencing a delay in acknowledgements being sent.  Thank you in advance for your patience as we work to resolve this issue.”

E-file Validation Appearing on Submission Page: “Must Have Efile Fee Record Saved to Efile” [RESOLVED]

20 Feb 23
Craig Smith
No Comments

2/22/23 – this has been resolved.


If your site is seeing the below e-file validation showing on the Submission page, you are likely tracking fees at your site. If the e-file validation does appear for you from the Submission Page, you will be unable to e-file the return from Submission temporarily. Instead, mark the return complete > save and exit. You can transmit from the Transmission menu. We have an open work item in with development to remove this validation so it is not visible to VITA/TCE sites. We expect this to be resolved by end of this week.