Author Archives: %s

Release Notes: February 13th – AZ, PA & WA

12 Feb 23
Craig Smith
No Comments

A product deployment for TaxSlayer Pro Online will occur Monday, February 13th, beginning at 5:00am ET to release the below update(s). Note that deployments may take up to 3 hours to complete. During this time, access to the program may be limited.

ARIZONA

  • Amended return explanation not saving in the program (Issue 8314)

PENNSYLVANIA

  • Marking PA return as “Final Return” not carrying to PDF (Issue 8356)

WASHINGTON

  • Add State PDF View to WA state grid view (2022 Update)

IRS Statement About Taxability of State Payments – Feb 11th Update

11 Feb 23
Craig Smith
No Comments

February 11th Update

IRS issues guidance on state tax payments to help taxpayers

IR-2023-23, Feb. 10, 2023

WASHINGTON — The Internal Revenue Service provided details today clarifying the federal tax status involving special payments made by 21 states in 2022.

The IRS has determined that in the interest of sound tax administration and other factors, taxpayers in many states will not need to report these payments on their 2022 tax returns.

During a review, the IRS determined it will not challenge the taxability of payments related to general welfare and disaster relief. This means that people in the following states do not need to report these state payments on their 2022 tax return: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island. Alaska is in this group as well, but please see below for more nuanced information.

In addition, many people in Georgia, Massachusetts, South Carolina and Virginia also will not include state payments in income for federal tax purposes if they meet certain requirements. For these individuals, state payments will not be included for federal tax purposes if the payment is a refund of state taxes paid and either the recipient claimed the standard deduction or itemized their deductions but did not receive a tax benefit.

The IRS appreciates the patience of taxpayers, tax professionals, software companies and state tax administrators as the IRS and Treasury worked to resolve this unique and complex situation.

The IRS is aware of questions involving special tax refunds or payments made by certain states related to the pandemic and its associated consequences in 2022. A variety of state programs distributed these payments in 2022 and the rules surrounding their treatment for federal income tax purposes are complex. While in general payments made by states are includable in income for federal tax purposes, there are exceptions that would apply to many of the payments made by states in 2022.

To assist taxpayers who have received these payments file their returns in a timely fashion, the IRS is providing the additional information below.

Refund of state taxes paid

If the payment is a refund of state taxes paid and either the recipient claimed the standard deduction or itemized their deductions but did not receive a tax benefit (for example, because the $10,000 tax deduction limit applied) the payment is not included in income for federal tax purposes.

Payments from the following states in 2022 fall in this category and will be excluded from income for federal tax purposes unless the recipient received a tax benefit in the year the taxes were deducted.

  • Georgia
  • Massachusetts
  • South Carolina
  • Virginia

General welfare and disaster relief payments

If a payment is made for the promotion of the general welfare or as a disaster relief payment, for example related to the outgoing pandemic, it may be excludable from income for federal tax purposes under the General Welfare Doctrine or as a Qualified Disaster Relief Payment. Determining whether payments qualify for these exceptions is a complex fact intensive inquiry that depends on a number of considerations.

The IRS has reviewed the types of payments made by various states in 2022 that may fall in these categories and given the complicated fact-specific nature of determining the treatment of these payments for federal tax purposes balanced against the need to provide certainty and clarity for individuals who are now attempting to file their federal income tax returns, the IRS has determined that in the best interest of sound tax administration and given the fact that the pandemic emergency declaration is ending in May, 2023 making this an issue only for the 2022 tax year, if a taxpayer does not include the amount of one of these payments in its 2022 income for federal income tax purposes, the IRS will not challenge the treatment of the 2022 payment as excludable for income on an original or amended return.

Payments from the following states fall in this category and the IRS will not challenge the treatment of these payments as excludable for federal income tax purposes in 2022.

  • Alaska [1]
  • California
  • Colorado
  • Connecticut
  • Delaware
  • Florida
  • Hawaii
  • Idaho
  • Illinois [2]
  • Indiana
  • Maine
  • New Jersey
  • New Mexico
  • New York2
  • Oregon
  • Pennsylvania
  • Rhode Island

For a list of the specific payments to which this applies, please see this chart.

Other payments

Other payments that may have been made by states are generally includable in income for federal income tax purposes. This includes the annual payment of Alaska’s Permanent Fund Dividend and any payments from states provided as compensation to workers.


[1] Only for the supplemental Energy Relief Payment received in addition to the annual Permanent Fund Dividend.

[2] Illinois and New York issued multiple payments and in each case one of the payments was a refund of taxes, which should be treated as noted above, and one of the payments is in the category of disaster relief payment.


 

The IRS is expected to release another update the week of February 12th.

February 3 update

IRS issues statement about the taxability of state payments

The IRS is aware of questions involving special tax refunds or payments made by states in 2022; we are working with state tax officials as quickly as possible to provide additional information and clarity for taxpayers.  There are a variety of state programs that distributed these payments in 2022 and the rules surrounding them are complex. We expect to provide additional clarity for as many states and taxpayers as possible next week.

For taxpayers uncertain about the taxability of their state payments, the IRS recommends they wait until additional guidance is available or consult with a reputable tax professional. For taxpayers and tax preparers with questions, the best course of action is to wait for additional clarification on state payments rather than calling the IRS. We also do not recommend amending a previously filed 2022 return.

Arizona Reject Code 991 – 140PTC Reject

10 Feb 23
Craig Smith
No Comments

Impacted AZ returns with the below reject can be resubmitted at this time.

AZ Reject Code 991 – 140PTC reject.

AZ is updating their system for this reject code, if the user claimed 140PTC credit but the taxpayer was not over age 65 but the spouse was then they received this reject, AZ is updating it to look at the spouse DOB now so it should be accepted.

 

Release Notes: February 10th – Basic Info, CP, DE, W-2, MN & MO

09 Feb 23
Craig Smith
No Comments

A product deployment for TaxSlayer Pro Online will occur Friday, February 10th, beginning at 5:00am ET to release the below update(s). Note that deployments may take up to 3 hours to complete. During this time, access to the program may be limited.

BASIC INFORMATION

  • Written communication checkboxes not displaying dropdown when selected (Issue 8225)

CUSTOMER PORTAL

  • TP/SP signature automatically applied to return when client did not click “sign” yet (Issue 8022)

DELAWARE

  • Credit for Low Income not calculating for TP with ITIN (Issue 8227)

FORM W-2

  • Box 3 not including the cents when tabbing off box 1 input (Issue 8063)

MINNESOTA

  • Working Family Credit calculating for a TP over age 64 with no qualifying children (Issue 8269)

MISSOURI

  • Issue generating a PDF for some MO returns (Issue 8284)

Release Notes: February 8th – 1040-X, DE, NM, NY & WA

07 Feb 23
Craig Smith
No Comments

A product deployment for TaxSlayer Pro Online will occur Wednesday, February 8th, beginning at 5:00am ET to release the below update(s). Note that deployments may take up to 3 hours to complete. During this time, access to the program may be limited.

1040-X

  • Unable to generate PDF when amended return present (Issue 7521)

DELAWARE

  • Pension exclusion calculation issue (Issue 8072)
  • Unemployment compensation is being incorrectly subtracted from state return (Issue 8064)

NEW MEXICO

  • Military retirement subtraction only supports input for one TP (Issue 8229)
  • PIT-RC, Line 4 not calculating (Issue 8112)
  • Refundable Nurse Credit not limited to $1,000 (Issue 8189)

NEW YORK

  • Reject Code R0102 (Issue 8075)

WASHINGTON

  • Remove e-file block for capturing e-mail address when not required by the state (Issue 8065)

 

 

Release Notes: February 6th – Basic Info, F2106 & State and Local Refund Worksheet

05 Feb 23
Craig Smith
No Comments

A product deployment for TaxSlayer Pro Online will occur Monday, February 6th, beginning at 5:00am ET to release the below update(s). Note that deployments may take up to 3 hours to complete. During this time, access to the program may be limited.

BASIC INFORMATION

  • Remove checkbox for 2019 earned income election (Issue 7764)

FORM 2106

  • Unable to make entry in only the “Miles Driven Before 7/1” field (Issue 7703)

STATE & LOCAL REFUND WORKSHEET

  • Line 6 not marking when TP/SP was blind in prior year (Issue 7495)

 

 

Release Notes: February 3rd – 1040-NR, ID & IA

02 Feb 23
Craig Smith
No Comments

A product deployment for TaxSlayer Pro Online will occur Friday, February 3rd, beginning at 5:00am ET to release the below update(s). Note that deployments may take up to 3 hours to complete. During this time, access to the program may be limited.

1040-NR

  • 1042-S, Income Code 16 for scholarship income incorrectly carrying value to Schedule 1, Line 8r (Issue 7894)

IDAHO

  • Update dependent standard deduction worksheet to add $400 instead of $350 (Issue 7864)
  • Dependent standard deduction worksheet, Line 3 not including scholarship income (Issue 7864)

IOWA

  • Add subtraction code AA in the other income dropdown (Issue 7763)

 

 

TaxSlayer Pro Online: E-file Menu Update to Mask Preparer Phone & E-mail

01 Feb 23
Craig Smith
No Comments

With the deployment this morning (February 1st), we delivered an update to the e-file pages where the Preparer Phone Number and E-mail on the right hand side is masked. If you wish to have this information visible, select the “eye” icon.

Note:  If you DO NOT want the volunteer name to show,  we have verified with our SPEC Relationship Manager and SPEC Program Manager that you can use either First Name, Last initial or First Initial, Last Name for their username account.